Category Archives: ToRead

Phil 8.29.16

7:00 – 6:00 ASRC

  • Selective Use of News Cues: A Multiple-Motive Perspective on Information Selection in Social Media Environments – Quite close to the Explorer/Confirmer/Avoider study but using a custom(?) browsing interface that tracked the marking of news stories to read later. Subjects were primed for a task with motivations – accuracy, defense and impression. Added this to paragraph 2.9, where explorers are introduced.
  • Looked through Visual Complexity – Mapping Patterns of Information, and it doesn’t even mention navigation. Most information mapping efforts are actually graphing efforts. Added a paragraph in section 2.7
  • Added a TODO for groupthink/confirmation bias, etc.
  • Chat with Heath about AI.He’s looking to build a MUD agent and will probably wind up learning WEKA, etc. so a win, I think.
  • Working on getting the configurator to add string values.
  • Added to DocumentStatistics. Need to switch over to getSourceInfo() from getAddressStrings in the Configurator.
  • Meeting with Wayne about the proposal. One of the branches of conversation went into some research he did on library architecture. That’s been rattling around in my head.
    We tend to talk about interface design where the scale is implicitly for the individual. The environment where these systems function is often thought of as an ecosystem, with the Darwinian perspective that goes along with that. But I think that such a perspective leads to ‘Survival of the Frictionlesss’, where the easiest thing to use wins and damn the larger consequences.
    Reflecting on how the architecture and layout of libraries affected the information interactions of the patrons, I wonder whether we should be thinking about Information Space Architecture. Such a perspective means that the relationships between design at differing scales needs to be considered. In the real world, architecture can encompass everything from the chairs in a room to the landscaping around the building and how that building fits into the skyline.
    I think that regarding information spaces as a designed continuum from the very small to very large is what my dissertation is about at its core. I want a park designed for people, not a wilderness, red in tooth and claw.

Phil 8.26.16

7:00 – 4:00 ASRC

    • Adding more model feedback
    • Something more to think about WRT Group Polarization models? Collective Memory and Spatial Sorting in Animal Groups
    • Need to be able to associate an @attribute  key/value map with Labeled2Dmatrix rows so that we can compare different nominal values across a shared set of numeric columns. This may wind up being a derived class?
      • Working on adding an array of key/value maps;
      • Forgot to add the name to the @data section – oops!
      • text is added to ARFF out. Should I add it to the xlsx outputs as well?
    • Here’s the initial run against the random test data within the class (L2D.arff).
=== Run information ===

Scheme: weka.classifiers.bayes.NaiveBayes
Relation: testdata
Instances: 8
Attributes: 12
name
sv1
sv2
sv3
p1
p2
p3
p4
s1
s2
s3
s4
Test mode: split 66.0% train, remainder test

=== Classifier model (full training set) ===

Naive Bayes Classifier

Class
Attribute p1 p2 p3 p4 s1 s2 s3 s4
(0.13) (0.13) (0.13) (0.13) (0.13) (0.13) (0.13) (0.13)
=======================================================================
sv1
p4-sv1 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
s2-sv1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
p2-sv1 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
s1-sv1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
[total] 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0

sv2
p2-sv2 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
s4-sv2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0
p1-sv2 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
s1-sv2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
[total] 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0

sv3
p2-sv3 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
p1-sv3 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
s4-sv3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0
p3-sv3 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
p4-sv3 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
s2-sv3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
s1-sv3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
[total] 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 8.0

p1
mean 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

p2
mean 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

p3
mean 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

p4
mean 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

s1
mean 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

s2
mean 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

s3
mean 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

s4
mean 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
std. dev. 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
weight sum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
precision 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



Time taken to build model: 0 seconds

=== Evaluation on test split ===

Time taken to test model on training split: 0 seconds

=== Summary ===

Correctly Classified Instances 0 0 %
Incorrectly Classified Instances 3 100 %
Kappa statistic 0
Mean absolute error 0.2499
Root mean squared error 0.4675
Relative absolute error 108.2972 %
Root relative squared error 133.419 %
Total Number of Instances 3

=== Detailed Accuracy By Class ===

TP Rate FP Rate Precision Recall F-Measure MCC ROC Area PRC Area Class
0.000 0.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ? ? p1
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.333 p2
0.000 0.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ? ? p3
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ? ? p4
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.500 s1
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 s2
0.000 0.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ? ? s3
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ? ? s4
Weighted Avg. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.611

=== Confusion Matrix ===

a b c d e f g h <-- classified as
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | a = p1
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 | b = p2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | c = p3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | d = p4
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 | e = s1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | f = s2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | g = s3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | h = s4
  • Need to add text data from xml or from other(wrapper info? structured data? UI selections?) sources